July’s Dimly Candled Luminary Retrospective

Had I more personal bandwidth and less feeling of a need to keep communications self-disciplinedly directorial, I might have paused more often in July to write openly about how things have been going, from lifeworld to workplace and back again. July was my first month in a new faculty-director position; I was welcomed warmly and with goodwill for the most part, though countless special effects strobed the month—additional nuisance flooding in one area of the Center, which I discovered on Sunday, July 5, while erranding a floor lamp from the Goodwill Store to my campus office; wandering into a gust of documents arrayed in ways that left me feeling like a befuddled reader and which lent especially to a looping mode of asking again then one more time, where is x, where is y, and would it be okay to build finding aids for the Lost, like me. And then there was wayfinding with workload agreements, such a stabilizing staple in my former workplace, questions about proportions and managing expectations, about workflows, organizational charts, the top three things I ought to be prioritizing. Wayfinding with policy documents and forms, fundraising messaging due for wordsmithing, and surveys. I have been well-served by working in other higher ed workplaces; in fact, as I was walking Feta just a little while ago, I was thinking that I’ve received my paychecks from higher ed institutions since September 1997, twenty-nine years ago. It’s not a brag but an experience check-in; what can I claim to know? what can I claim to understand? what I have I seen before? Experiential volume and density have not been at issue; rather, the number and complexity of eddies on any given day, those have left me a bit more off balance than I have felt since at least February 2019. I rode the bus each day; on top of that, I’ve decided not to carry my work laptop with me everywhere I go, so that choice plays at least a small part in the nebula-tripping: I am adapting to a new document ecology on a more immediate scale, too.

I had not anticipated that July would include so many skunks and a skunk spraying incident. Also one possum. And yesterday, July 31, a gopher in the run, which scampered off without resistance. July included the flooding, which I already mentioned, but also the Fourth of July holiday, followed by Art Fair, which included wildfire smoke so thick it was unbearable to go outside for at least two days. It included more dealings with contractors who I am counting on to help me stop water from flooding across the garage floor every time it rains more than an inch in two hours; a contractor finally did the work, and so far the swale is doing its diversionary gravity guided best, not that we have had much rain. I’ve had to run a sprinkler to get the grass seed to sprout. There, too, the three hens have ignored the makeshift fence I strung up to keep them away from the swale. Forecasts suggest the swale will be tested in the week ahead, discourse communities taking note of foreseeable rainfall from wildly unreliable weather station clankers.

I’ve sunken more time than I guessed I would into a couple of matters that must be invisibly cloaked, a letter-non-letter written-not-written whose content I dare to be curious incurious about (I was incompetent with Rubic’s cubes, too, whatever this may say about the trappings of logic problems). More time than I guessed I would flush on it went into an unauthorized septic system dig-up at the selling, selling, soon-to-be-sold (?) house in Virginia; this was an enormously stressful lightning strike in that we had listed as-is and we knew the septic was aged but functioning adequately. The commonwealth’s laws evidently assign to septic tank companies responsibility for inspecting and evaluating systems; in the past five years, we are two for two with SW Virginia septic companies accipurpodentally arriving and digging at the house when nobody was home, THEN concluding that the system needed to be replaced, while not providing any visual evidence of what they claim to have witnessed that led them to conclude replacement, of a tank, for example, was warranted. Let’s just say that my trust for stewards of shit-flow systems in Virginia was low and was lowered. Even worse, the company never once contacted me. The realtor team sought to mediate and appease us; that appeasement ended up costing $3000. Could have been better and could have been worse.

And then there was the NCTE’s decharting of CCCC, speaking of shit-flow systems. In the past two weeks, we have seen the larger organization disband (kinda?) its subsidiary, followed by a flood of online sentiments with many insistent on continuation, and a dozen efforts to issue solidarity statements, to fundraise, to regionally reorganize, to more grandly reorganize, to sort and to rescue, and to stay afloat. A new listserv. I have thoughts and have kept them mostly to myself; I’d rather they went into the final chapter of the book manuscript I have been too slowly writing and drawing, whose fifth-final chapter I now understand due in part to the premise I had planned fitting aptly with what I think has happened these two weeks. There is of course a to be continued night sky of question marks floating above the field at this moment. I believe in the elected leaders sorting things out, though I don’t know how to keep up with who has resigned, who has remained, and who has resigned-then-remained; I respect the open processing by so many in digital spaces but am not myself feeling especially rewarded to engage about it there, not now, maybe not in those ways.

July included a visit from a long-time friend and former colleague, a visit from an aunt, a phone call with my brother, countless text messages, especially about NCTE’s heinous actions, and more. For the new job, at least three onboarding meetings that have exceeded two hours. Two on Zoom. One went three hours. I have had questions. My calendar is a domino chain with as many pieces tipping over as are being set up, such that our already-once-rescheduled August retreat will now have to be cancelled. The other day I noticed that the rhubarb plugs I planted in early June were clean topped off by a deer, but all things being morbidly equilibrating, Feta and I also saw that a deer was killed along Packard in the last 24 hours, and upon seeing it I immediately hoped for those rhubarb leaves to have been delicious. When delights are rare, savor them, for which delights are near to the end of any story, who can say. I wrote and sent a review of an article, which I wanted to be better because its premise is smart and its description widened my eyes, but then, I did what I could to offer constructive feedback, always rooting for the thing reviewed to gain shape through this process.

It’s Is.’s 20th, so I should carry on in that direction soon. July is only half-told. There was a trip to Detroit’s federal building; what a grayed out scene and the parking was $10 but the convenience was worth every cent. I didn’t have cash; the monitor allowed me to pay $12 on CashApp. Still worth it. There was an hours long intervention into a domestic dispute while walking Feta one evening; offering rides (let’s go to the store to get you the pack of cigarettes you want) to ease tensions; we don’t need the police to assist in this one. Later, texts of gratitude and the suggestion that I reminded everyone of someone famous who they could name, to which I confessed that I am ordinary. In July I had the right rear tire on the Maverick pick up a small nail, reducing its air pressure to 14 PSI. I aired it up, went about the day, then checked it later before driving it to the nearby Belle Tire. It had only psssed four PSI in three hours. Belle Tire fixed it quickly and for free. Those are some highlights; August’s onward song already fading in as I tap my foot c’mon c’mon.

Cleveland 2026 Cs

Cleveland 2026 Cs in the rearview mirror, 400 miles to Virginia yesterday, the few photos I took (or 📸 friends sent me), like a flipbook with two-thirds of its pages missing: 24th story strictly fog in the forecast; 8 a.m. Friday on bandwidths; skyline; presenterism; more cowbell; Lake Erie(lhonan), which I learned translates to ‘long tail’; 8 a.m. Saturday on worknets; two of VT’s best!; and once back at the holler, Feta admiring my tree climbing skills. Saw some fantastic presentations and always-always rewarding to see so many longtime friends. #travelog #4c26 #cleveland

Added: I should have mentioned that Cs feels livelier when it coincides with a major fencing tournament, hundreds of young competitors scurrying through the convention center hallways with foils drawn and us academics trundling with the slow confidence that says, ‘Younguns, impale me if you must but I won’t feel it because I am MADE of scar tissue.’ 😆

  • Nine photos from the 2026 Conference on College Composition and Communication (CCCC) in Cleveland, Ohio.

Collectanea 27.25 Atrophy-Monarchs-Garage

Week of June 30, 2025

Cognitive Atrophy

“The integration of LLMs into learning environments presents a complex duality: while they enhance accessibility and personalization of education, they may inadvertently contribute to cognitive atrophy through excessive reliance on AI-driven solutions [3]. Prior research points out that there is a strong negative correlation between AI tool usage and critical thinking skills, with younger users exhibiting higher dependence on AI tools and consequently lower cognitive performance scores [3]” (10).

—Nataliya Kosmyna, Eugene Haptmann, Ye Tong Yuan, Jessica Situ, Zian-Hao Liao, Ashly Vivian Beresnitzky, Iris Braunstein, Pattie Maes (MIT, MassArt, Wellesley1Why don’t citation systems include institutional affiliations?). (2025). Your Brain on ChatGPT: Accumulation of Cognitive Debt when Using an AI Assistant for Essay Writing Task (arXiv:2506.08872). arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2506.08872 #cognition #debt #writing #LLMs #AI #frenzy #atrophy #performance #humanbrains #consequences

A prepublication version of the Kosmyna et al. article, “Your Brain on ChatGPT,” circulated a couple of weeks ago. At >200 pages, whew, it is long and ornately specialized at points. I’ve read enough of it to conclude a) it will, on the sunny side of review, be a landmark study, an important account leading to further research on the cognitive consequences of LLM over-reliance (notably, a developmental vortex fueled by enthusiastic, uncritical adoptions and battering-ram marketing efforts by boom or bust AI startups), b) the approach to writing essays at the center of the study is woefully reductive (i.e., timed for 20 minutes, AP-test-styled prompting without much context or purpose), c) the ability to quote one’s own essay shortly after writing it is a bizarre and not altogether persuasive indicator of cognitive performance, yet this was the greatest differentiator among the three participating groups (brain-only, search engine, and LLM), and d) there remains a vast gulf between cognitive neurosciences, rhetorical invention/eureka/epiphany studies2We don’t really have anything like Eureka Studies or Epiphany Studies; perhaps all of the Humanities should retool in this direction, renaming minors as Epiphany Studies, or, if you are at a tech/stem school, Epiphany Engineering. The curriculum would draw upon writing and rhetoric, philosophy, history, language and literature, and cognitive neuroscience, regarding learning as a so-called “open period,” of the sort that the neuroscientists studying psychedelics describe in reparative/therapeutic terms as a window for synaptic rerigging., and reading and writing research as it is valued in the humanities, much less in Rhetoric and Composition/Writing Studies.


Visual Portmanteau: Monarch Butterfly + Mandala

Figure 1. “Monarchdala.”

Mature, blooming milkweed at the back of the holler is aflutter, buzzing with pollinators, including a small kaleidoscope of Monarch butterflies. And lately I had been exploring in Procreate various brush and palette customizations, watching a few tutorials, learning how to make stamps. What followed were experimental, exploratory pieces, like this one, which uses drawing guides for mirrored quadrants, then bending and combining selected elements, adding color from a custom butterfly photograph palette, and inlayering a gradient backdrop for a fade of center-to-periphery brightness.


The Standard Way into the Sheepfold

“What is the good of research ?
What is worth doing ?
Shall we be allowed to do it ?
Who will do it ?
In answering the first question, I hold that by the scholarship which is the product of research the standing of our work in the academic world will be improved. It will make us orthodox. Research is the standard way into the sheepfold” (17).

~

“Now, is there any reason, in this age when every other branch of human knowledge is being ruthlessly pulled to pieces and tested why our branch should be passed over?” (18).

—James Winans (Cornell U). (1915). The need for research. The Quarterly Journal of Speech, 1(1), 17–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00335631509360453. #branches #research #orthodoxy #sheepfold #speech #communication #disciplinarity


From the Mail Bag 📭

Sadly, there was no mail from readers this week.


G-l-o-r-i-a

Figure 2. Summer 2025’s first morning glory bloom.

5ives

Five years, five program covers from past Conferences on College Composition and Communication. Why these? Albeit somewhat peripheral to my current research project, they’re quirky with their idiomatic, time-spanning expressions of then and now: the phrase “composition and communication” repeated 53 times from 1960; warpy, nested Cs from 1962; an optical illusion from 1974; seven missiles soaring from left to right in 1977; and an earth-sized pencil from 1983.


Walking as Artistic Practice Syllabus

“This workshop is designed as a brief survey of some of the origins, theories, processes, and manifestations of walking as art. We will read, watch, and discuss perspectives on walking-based projects. Using this information as a springboard, we will complete walking exercises, and execute our own original walking projects.”

—Ellen Mueller (Arts Midwest). (2021). Walking as Artistic Practice. https://teaching.ellenmueller.com/walking/.

I have been meandering in wide arcs toward a plan for this fall’s pair of online-asynchronous sections of ENGL3844: Writing and Digital Media. The course description mentions digital writing within “the context of business, organizational, and political practices.” It also mentions production, devices, data visualizations, videos, web design, “and more.” Sample syllabi I have been able to track down tend to outline three major projects, usually something related to podcasting or sound editing, something related to data analysis and visualization, and something related to video. The official, CUSP-approved outcomes are keyed toward ethics (“ethical design strategies”) with three bullets emphasizing visual, video, and web. I haven’t taught this particular class before at Virginia Tech. The online-asynchronous format adds complications to the kinds of engagement and interaction one can reasonably expect, of course. But I have been thinking more about short-form exercises paired with an anthologics-styled (perhaps ABCDEary format) assortment. Self-introductory account of digital mecology/technologies of self; microthemes prompted with alternatingly terrestrial (food, walking, fieldwork) and digital (photo, sound, hypertext, map, 4D/time, etc.). Inflections of Ashley Holmes’ device-mediated environs (writing on location), inflections of Ellen Mueller’s walking courses reframed as writing on foot, Geoffrey Sirc’s seriality, throwback maps of the imagination (e.g., what goes on in that building I walk past every day?), and more. “And more” as the inventive indeterminacy better fitted with digital writing than anything else I am finding or can think of as of yet, seven weeks or so from the start of classes.


Waiting There for Me

Figure 3. In the garage.

About Collectanea

Collectanea is a series I’m trying out in Summer 2025 at Earth Wide Moth. Each entry accumulates throughout the week and is formed by gathering quotations, links, drawings, and miscellany. The title of the entry notes the week and year (the sixth in this series from Week 27 of 2025, or the Week of June 30). I open a tab, add a little of this or that most days. Why? Years ago my habitude toward serial composition and, thus, toward blogging, favored lighter, less formal, and more varied fragments; gradually, social media began to reel in many of these short form entries, recasting them as posts dropped a Facebook or Instagram or Twitter (while it lasted), albeit with dwindling ripple effect into the ad-addled and algorithm-ambivalent streams. This space, meanwhile, began to feel to me like it wanted more thoughtfully developed entries bearing the shape and length of what you might find on Medium or Substack. But, because I am drafting toward a book project most mornings, I don’t quite have reliable essayistic bandwidth for Earth Wide Moth this summer. Collectanea, if it goes according to my small bites chicken scratch plan, will be a release valve for the piling up of too many tabs open, functioning as a shareable, intermittent (weekly?) repository for small pieces cut and pasted from stuff I am reading, and also as a scrapbook for illustrations. -DM

Buck moth larva, near posts at SW corner of the holler. #stinging #caterpillar #wonderhollow #rollcall
Subscribe

Enter your email address to receive notification when any new entry is posted. It’s free, direct, and timely, routed to your inbox so that you may never have to visit again the grim, extractive vortex of social media platforms to be reminded that EWM exists.

Meal moth

Notes

  • 1
    Why don’t citation systems include institutional affiliations? ↩︎
  • 2
    We don’t really have anything like Eureka Studies or Epiphany Studies; perhaps all of the Humanities should retool in this direction, renaming minors as Epiphany Studies, or, if you are at a tech/stem school, Epiphany Engineering. The curriculum would draw upon writing and rhetoric, philosophy, history, language and literature, and cognitive neuroscience, regarding learning as a so-called “open period,” of the sort that the neuroscientists studying psychedelics describe in reparative/therapeutic terms as a window for synaptic rerigging. ↩︎

CCCC Vendor Booklists

It’s only a partial list–titles from Pittsburgh, Southern Illinois, and Parlor–collected into a PDF after gathering them at the most recent CCCC book exhibit. Got me thinking about how it would be nice to have such lists compiled and aggregable, year after year, a kind of time series list amenable to isolating years or small clusters of years just for noticing what was circulating at the time. I’d picked them up in the first place because we have a tiny sliver of funding for supplying rhetoric and composition/writing studies focused books to Halle Library on campus, but when I mentioned this to a colleague, she asked for the complied PDF, too, because it carries over readily to placing more direct requests to libraries for end-of-budget-year acquisitions.

2016 CCCC Vendor Booklists by DerekMueller

Keywords in Threshold Concepts, #4c15 Poster Presentation

I’m in Tampa this week for the 2015 Conference on College Composition and Communication–an event I’ve been attending every year (except one) since 1999. This year I proposed (and was accepted to present) a poster, and after several hours of finessing for more white space, shifting elements around, and tinkering in Illustrator, here’s what I’ll be standing next to for 75 minutes this afternoon.

Keywords in Threshold Concepts: Time-Binding and Methodologizing Disciplinary Lexicon by DerekMueller

CCCC Proposal Keywords

Not much especially revelatory or surprising in my mentioning that I am happy to see keywords added to the CCCC 2015 proposal system. I love the idea, see it as an important and long overdue addition to the process and also a promising source of new semantic patterning studies (e.g., corroborating proposal language, theme, keywords, and more). I had the good fortune of working with Joyce Carter at last year’s Stage II review in mid-June, and, as we assembled solo proposals into panels, the prospective usefulness of a secondary classification system surfaced again and again, and we talked quite a bit about how a modest set of keywords could, without adding much to the work involved with preparing proposals, suggest otherwise quiet or subtle threads across proposals.

Here’s the recent video from Joyce describing the what and why of the new keywords field:

A week ago Saturday, the Saturday of #4c14 in Indianapolis, I was at the Cross-Generational Task Force meeting, where we spent a few minutes talking about the importance of recommending a semantic baseline for the keyword associated with cross-generational proposals. We settled on XGEN. Simple and with no hyphen. Other variations might have been “cross-gen,” “x-generational,” “cross-generational,” “X-GEN,” and so on. Could be twenty or more variations. Some of these variations might still sneak onto proposals, despite the suggestion of XGEN, and that’s okay. All variations will be useful as descriptive keywords, right? That said, the semantic variation risks restricting their usefulness to description, which is the main reason we agreed upon XGEN as a the preferred indexical token. With it, we improve the term’s prospects of functioning both descriptively and relationally.

I don’t know whether other groups will follow this model. I look forward to seeing how this will go. How might groups wishing to sponsor a keyword do so? With email blasts to listservs or to SIG and Standing Group membership rosters? Sure. These approaches will probably work just fine. But I was also considering, after seeing Joyce’s video and after the task force meeting (and the follow-up email to WPA-l), how a simple collector, such as an openly editable Google Doc, might support broader efforts to articulate common keywords that are both descriptive and relational (or indexically reliable across the set). In the spirit of give-things-a-try, I’ve created just such a document at #4c15 Proposal Keyword Collector (reference), and will add to it as I see suggestions pop up on WPA-L or elsewhere. It’s openly editable, too, so if you have an idea for a more or less sponsored keyword that would cohere presentations across these secondary classifications, please feel free to add to it.

#E17, Polymorphic Frames of Pre-Tenure WPAs, #4c14

Our CCCC roundtable wrapped up a few minutes ago (exactly :05, according to the entry-scheduler’s timestamp). Eight of us planned and proposed this as a session that would be delivered simultaneously in Indianapolis, live, and also via Twitter, using scheduled tweets with the #4c14 hashtag with links to YouTube versions of the presentations, complete with closed-captioning. I finished setting up the scheduled tweets a few minutes ago–on Monday the 17th–and thought I may as well embed the full playlist into a blog entry, too, both to capture the event here and to circulate it yet again for anyone who might have missed it.

I’m sure there is more to say about it–both about the mix of pre-tenure WPA perspectives collected here and also about the production process involved with planning and putting together the slidedecks, audio files, and transcripts. I’m also interested in when this is delivered and circulated in time. How many nows? With any luck, there will be time enough for thinking through this more and considering the value in session-wide durable artifacts (hyper-deictic time capsules) after we’re all tick-tocking on the other side of this busy week.

Pi Chart #4c14

I’d planned for this to be an entry about next Thursday’s roundtable, E.17, “Polymorphic Frames of Pre-Tenure WPAs: Eight Accounts of Hybridity and Pronoia,” 4:45-6 p.m. in the Indiana Marriott Downtown, Indiana Ballroom E, First Floor (that’s right: both hotel and room are named after the state…enough-iana alreadiana). But I’m short on time, looking at a to-do list the length of my arm, and due to be at a reading group at the Corner Brewery in a few minutes on Doug Brent’s “The Research Paper and Why We Should Still Care.” About the roundtable: eight of us put it together with the promise that we would present live versions in Indianapolis and at the same time deliver bundled and closed-captioned versions via scheduled Tweet-drops set for the same time as our panel. It’s an experiment with openness and circulation, in this sense, and since we’re one of the few E sessions scheduled in the Indiana Marriott (not the JW Marriott…though I’m still not sure I grasp what this even means), our double-up of live and YouTube versions is just as well.

My portion of the roundtable is called “Mad Handles”–a double-teaming of basketball handles and data visualization handles, but there I’ve gone and already said too much. For at least ten days in early February, I had this and only this as my main slide–even considered using it as the only slide for the entire talk, an animated GIFmash on an interminable “forever” loop.

This and more next Thursday evening.

ReCCCCap

Nothing against St. Louis, Mo., but when–around Friday afternoon–light rain made the streets smell like sweatsock-funk, a few of us speculated that the arch really is a giant’s clipped toenail. No, no, it’s marvelous beyond that: a giant’s clipped toenail fitted with an elevator inside. Blame the odor on the pollen, on the trees being in full bloom fall-veg-detritus-rotting, or on the mighty Mississippi’s effervescence. Credit it to whatever you want and in the meantime plug your nose. No need to plug it forever; it’s fine to breathe again when you come to the ten story cross in Effingham made of blessed and corrugated aluminum sheeting.

I had a great CCCC. So many friends to catch up with, so many great conversations. Proud of how EMU students represented. Proud of the smarts and investment shown by the EM-Journal team. Proud of how Ivo Baltic and his Bobcats went toe-to-toe with basketball giant UNC on Friday evening. I damn close to wept with joy when Ohio surged late in the game and I got to see all the UNC fans next to me in Section 138 Row 22 biting their nails, holding each other’s sweaty hands, looking like they’d encountered a real bobcat in the wild.

The ticket would’ve allowed me to stick around, but I skipped the NC State-KU game and instead walked to Bridge with a few colleagues, enjoyed a sour and an IPA, hummus and tapenade, smoked paprika popcorn that was too salty but ate it anyway.

Went to more sessions than I expected to this week:

  • *Wed. evening, Master’s Degree Consortium of Writing Studies Specialists
  • *Thur., A. Digital Pedagogy Posters
  • *B.20 Technology and Histories of Composition Studies
  • D.29 Gateways into the Disciplines: Navigating Different Disciplinary Contexts to Support Writing Across Campus
  • E.Feat. Gateways to Leadership: A Reflective Roundtable on Opportunities within NCTE and CCCC
  • TSIG.1 Retired Faculty in Rhetoric/Composition/Writing Studies
  • Fri., G.Feat. Technologizing Funk/Funkin Technology: Stevie Wonder’s Talking Book as a Gateway to a Black Digital Rhetoric
  • H.13 Latour and Rhetoric: Kairos, Contingency, Techne
  • I.Feat. “This Stuff Hasn’t Changed Much in 2500 Years, Has It?”: Rhetorical Terms in an Attention Economy
  • J.03 MA Programs in Rhetoric and Writing as Sites of Transition and (Trans)Formation
  • *K.31 Think-tank for Newcomers: Developing Papers and Sessions for 2013
  • L.18 Everyone Knows This is Nowhere: Writing in the Musical Age
  • M.7 Computational Rhetoric in Theory and Practice

Stars mark the sessions where I had some sort of speaking or leadership role. I have quite a bit more to say about several of the sessions, but I also face the inevitable workswell–a sheer ccccliff–that follows from several days of being online less than usual because who can afford in-room internet: advising emails, an online course to get caught up in, a batch of deep definition essays from graduate students, an article revision due 3/30. Plus, I drove both to and from St. Louis and the Element suffered an effed windshield wiper late last night, so I feel a bit road-weary today and also need to get over to Advanced Auto Parts for a replacement blade. Maybe around the mid-late part of the week I’ll crawl back through my notes and elaborate on some of what I learned at the various sessions, or maybe not. I left St. Louis both exhausted and energized, which is in my eight or ten trips to the conference as much as one can hope for.

CCCC Atlanta Rewind, Part II

I don’t think there will be a part 3 in this series, but I wanted to post in a consolidated location the various pieces I brought to Atlanta last week. Steve offered a careful play-by-play of many of the meals and local excursions I was a part of. And he mentioned in the entry that we had a fairly small audience at the N.30 session. With that in mind, I figured I may as well render my talk into an overdubbed video and post it to YouTube where it will surely get a couple of more views in the year to come.

But first, Steve’s video, which initiated and enframed our roundtable:

Below is my contribution to the roundtable. To continue experimenting with YouTube’s closed captioning, I uploaded the full script of my talk as a text file. I’m impressed at how capably YouTube creates alignments between the video’s audio track and the text. Also, all of the oooh-aaah cloud photographs come from the recent New York Times installation, “Up in the Clouds.”

And finally, here’s the poster I tacked up in the Computer Connection room and that I’ve posted in a half dozen places already.

3.33 Ways: Tracing Rhetorical Style from Prose to New Media

The accompanying a/v playlist (linked from the QR codes) is available over here.