{"id":7036,"date":"2006-09-08T10:45:06","date_gmt":"2006-09-08T10:45:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2006\/09\/08\/carlton-comp-as\/"},"modified":"2006-09-08T10:45:06","modified_gmt":"2006-09-08T10:45:06","slug":"carlton-comp-as","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2006\/09\/08\/carlton-comp-as\/","title":{"rendered":"Carlton, &#8220;Comp as a Postdisciplinary Formation&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<span class=\"span-reading-time rt-reading-time\" style=\"display: block;\"><span class=\"rt-label rt-prefix\">\u23f3 Approximate reading time: <\/span> <span class=\"rt-time\"> 2<\/span> <span class=\"rt-label rt-postfix\">mins<\/span><\/span>\n<p style=\"text-indent: -0.5in; margin-left: 0.5in; margin-bottom: 0in\">Carlton,<br \/>\n          Susan Brown. &quot;Composition as a Postdisciplinary Formation.&quot;<br \/>\n          <i>Rhetoric Review<\/i> 14.1 (1995) 78-87.<\/p>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Carlton levels a complicated argument about whether or not composition ought<br \/>\nto be framed as a discipline. She begins with North&#8217;s concerns about a<br \/>\npreponderance of lore and multiple, contending methods from <i>The Making of<br \/>\nKnowledge in Composition<\/i>, and she echoes North&#8217;s &quot;ambivalence&quot; about<br \/>\nconferring disciplinary status on composition studies. Perhaps, Carlton<br \/>\nsuggests, a postdisciplinary characterization is more appropriate, given that<br \/>\npostdisciplinary practitioners &quot;reproduce the complex features representative of<br \/>\ndisciplines&quot; and they &quot;generate material disciplinary apparatuses that make<br \/>\nrepresentation possible&quot; (79) even while they &quot;think and act beyond the limits<br \/>\nof the traditional discipline&quot; (79).<\/p>\n<p>Carlton considers the rise of doctoral programs in composition (a turn<br \/>\ncommonly viewed a synonymous with professionalization and credentialing, which<br \/>\nalso render permanent a laboring underclass of contingent faculty). Especially<br \/>\nwith the production of composition studies (a kind of institutional &quot;power<br \/>\nplay&quot;), we must continue to be concerned with how we represent disciplinary<br \/>\nactivity (both textual and extratextual) in such a way that accounts for &quot;a<br \/>\ncomplex set of cultural practices&quot; (79). <\/p>\n<p>Included here is a recap of a disagreement between Janice Lauer and Patricia<br \/>\nHarkin at the &#8217;91 CCCC in Boston over the status of lore as a legitimate form of<br \/>\ndisciplinary knowledge (reread this section). Carlton prefers a postdisciplinary<br \/>\nstance (an appropriation of the &quot;post&quot; logics figured in postructural currents)<br \/>\nover the antidisciplinary stance. Finally, the article argues that we must<br \/>\nexpand on programmatic and curricular gains and resist compromising lore or<br \/>\nfavoring a monolithic methodological orientation to gain disciplinary status.<\/p>\n<p>Terms: &quot;postdisciplinary&quot; (78)<\/p>\n<p>&quot;Many of us in composition studies oscillate among these three attitudes of<br \/>\nambivalence, celebration, and hostility; but I believe that ambivalence is the<br \/>\nmost productive stance, as it <b>acknowledges the complexity of composition<br \/>\nstudies&#8217; relationship to the disciplinary apparatus<\/b>&quot; (78).<\/p>\n<p>&quot;Without denigrating our recent epistemological and ideological ventures, we<br \/>\ncan still claim that their continued transformative power is limited by the<br \/>\nextent to which we are able to make good decisions now about how to structure <b><br \/>\nthe current institutional spaces we inhabit<\/b> and how to construct additional<br \/>\ninstitutional spaces for ourselves&quot; (80).<\/p>\n<p>&quot;I agree with Rankin that if a type of knowledge or relationship is to<br \/>\nflourish within the university beyond a single classroom or a small, local<br \/>\ncommunity of practitioners, it must be <b>coded<\/b> in a way that makes it <b><br \/>\ncongruent with contemporary ideas of what knowledge can <i>be<\/i><\/b>&quot; (82).<\/p>\n<p>&quot;A <b>rhizomatic structure<\/b> runs <b>counter<\/b> to the prevailing <b>norms<br \/>\nof disciplinarity<\/b>. It constitutes a material, extratextual critique and<br \/>\nalternative to a university norm&quot; (82).<\/p>\n<p>&quot;Why a teleconference? By using <b>new technology<\/b>, the practitioners<br \/>\nrepresent their discussion as &#8216;cutting edge&#8217; knowledge. By using expensive<br \/>\ntechnology, the practitioner conference acquires &#8216;value.&#8217; These appeals to<br \/>\ndisciplinary, <b>university codes of authority<\/b> allow a postdisciplinary<br \/>\npractice to be <b>smuggled<\/b> in under the very <b>gaze of the disciplinarians<\/b>&quot;<br \/>\n(83).<\/p>\n<p>&quot;Instead, we need a <b>critical mass<\/b> of compositionists <b>in tenured<br \/>\npositions<\/b>, not a few isolated and outnumbered representatives, if we are<br \/>\ngoing to expand the spaces for cultural critique and democratic action&quot; (84).<\/p>\n<dl>\n<dt>Related sources:<\/dt>\n<dd>Bourdieu, Pierre. <i>An Outline of a Theory of Practice<\/i>. Trans.<br \/>\n  Richard Nice. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1977.<\/dd>\n<dd>Lauer, Janice. &quot;Rhetoric and Composition: A Rhizome.&quot; CCC Convention.<br \/>\n  Boston, 22 Mar. 1991.<\/dd>\n<dd>Winterowd, W. Ross. <i>Contemporary Rhetoric: A Conceptual Background with<br \/>\n  Readings<\/i>. New York: Harcourt, 1975.<\/dd>\n<\/dl>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><span class=\"span-reading-time rt-reading-time\" style=\"display: block;\"><span class=\"rt-label rt-prefix\">\u23f3 Approximate reading time: <\/span> <span class=\"rt-time\"> 2<\/span> <span class=\"rt-label rt-postfix\">mins<\/span><\/span>Carlton, Susan Brown. &quot;Composition as a Postdisciplinary Formation.&quot; Rhetoric Review 14.1 (1995) 78-87.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[174],"tags":[1233,178,645,1234,492,445,1232,1235,1236,692,1237,1022,1238,1239],"class_list":["post-7036","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-writing_technol","tag-ambivalence","tag-composition","tag-discipline","tag-doctoral","tag-evolution","tag-knowledge","tag-lauer","tag-lore","tag-methodology","tag-north","tag-postdiscipline","tag-programs","tag-rhizome","tag-tenure"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Carlton, &quot;Comp as a Postdisciplinary Formation&quot; - Earth Wide Moth<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2006\/09\/08\/carlton-comp-as\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Carlton, &quot;Comp as a Postdisciplinary Formation&quot; - Earth Wide Moth\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"\u23f3 Approximate reading time:  2 minsCarlton, Susan Brown. &quot;Composition as a Postdisciplinary Formation.&quot; Rhetoric Review 14.1 (1995) 78-87.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2006\/09\/08\/carlton-comp-as\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Earth Wide Moth\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/derek.mueller\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/derek.mueller\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2006-09-08T10:45:06+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Derek Mueller\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Derek Mueller\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/2006\\\/09\\\/08\\\/carlton-comp-as\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/2006\\\/09\\\/08\\\/carlton-comp-as\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Derek Mueller\",\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/66fc5e80a62f53057760790b1cfeb24b\"},\"headline\":\"Carlton, &#8220;Comp as a Postdisciplinary Formation&#8221;\",\"datePublished\":\"2006-09-08T10:45:06+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/2006\\\/09\\\/08\\\/carlton-comp-as\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":579,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/66fc5e80a62f53057760790b1cfeb24b\"},\"keywords\":[\"ambivalence\",\"composition\",\"discipline\",\"doctoral\",\"evolution\",\"knowledge\",\"Lauer\",\"lore\",\"methodology\",\"North\",\"postdiscipline\",\"programs\",\"rhizome\",\"tenure\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Writing Technologies\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/2006\\\/09\\\/08\\\/carlton-comp-as\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/2006\\\/09\\\/08\\\/carlton-comp-as\\\/\",\"name\":\"Carlton, \\\"Comp as a Postdisciplinary Formation\\\" - Earth Wide Moth\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2006-09-08T10:45:06+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/2006\\\/09\\\/08\\\/carlton-comp-as\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/2006\\\/09\\\/08\\\/carlton-comp-as\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/2006\\\/09\\\/08\\\/carlton-comp-as\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"http:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Carlton, &#8220;Comp as a Postdisciplinary Formation&#8221;\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"http:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"Earth Wide Moth\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/66fc5e80a62f53057760790b1cfeb24b\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"http:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":[\"Person\",\"Organization\"],\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/66fc5e80a62f53057760790b1cfeb24b\",\"name\":\"Derek Mueller\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/04\\\/cropped-bmartwork.png?fit=1220%2C480\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/04\\\/cropped-bmartwork.png?fit=1220%2C480\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/04\\\/cropped-bmartwork.png?fit=1220%2C480\",\"width\":1220,\"height\":480,\"caption\":\"Derek Mueller\"},\"logo\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/04\\\/cropped-bmartwork.png?fit=1220%2C480\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/www.derekmueller.net\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/derek.mueller\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/dereknmueller\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/user\\\/dnmueller\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/author\\\/dmueller\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Carlton, \"Comp as a Postdisciplinary Formation\" - Earth Wide Moth","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2006\/09\/08\/carlton-comp-as\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Carlton, \"Comp as a Postdisciplinary Formation\" - Earth Wide Moth","og_description":"\u23f3 Approximate reading time:  2 minsCarlton, Susan Brown. &quot;Composition as a Postdisciplinary Formation.&quot; Rhetoric Review 14.1 (1995) 78-87.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2006\/09\/08\/carlton-comp-as\/","og_site_name":"Earth Wide Moth","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/derek.mueller","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/derek.mueller","article_published_time":"2006-09-08T10:45:06+00:00","author":"Derek Mueller","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Derek Mueller","Est. reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2006\/09\/08\/carlton-comp-as\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2006\/09\/08\/carlton-comp-as\/"},"author":{"name":"Derek Mueller","@id":"http:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/66fc5e80a62f53057760790b1cfeb24b"},"headline":"Carlton, &#8220;Comp as a Postdisciplinary Formation&#8221;","datePublished":"2006-09-08T10:45:06+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2006\/09\/08\/carlton-comp-as\/"},"wordCount":579,"publisher":{"@id":"http:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/66fc5e80a62f53057760790b1cfeb24b"},"keywords":["ambivalence","composition","discipline","doctoral","evolution","knowledge","Lauer","lore","methodology","North","postdiscipline","programs","rhizome","tenure"],"articleSection":["Writing Technologies"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2006\/09\/08\/carlton-comp-as\/","url":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2006\/09\/08\/carlton-comp-as\/","name":"Carlton, \"Comp as a Postdisciplinary Formation\" - Earth Wide Moth","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2006-09-08T10:45:06+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2006\/09\/08\/carlton-comp-as\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2006\/09\/08\/carlton-comp-as\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2006\/09\/08\/carlton-comp-as\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"http:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Carlton, &#8220;Comp as a Postdisciplinary Formation&#8221;"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"http:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/#website","url":"http:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/","name":"Earth Wide Moth","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"http:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/66fc5e80a62f53057760790b1cfeb24b"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"http:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":["Person","Organization"],"@id":"http:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/66fc5e80a62f53057760790b1cfeb24b","name":"Derek Mueller","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/cropped-bmartwork.png?fit=1220%2C480","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/cropped-bmartwork.png?fit=1220%2C480","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/cropped-bmartwork.png?fit=1220%2C480","width":1220,"height":480,"caption":"Derek Mueller"},"logo":{"@id":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/cropped-bmartwork.png?fit=1220%2C480"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.derekmueller.net\/","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/derek.mueller","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/dereknmueller\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/dnmueller"],"url":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/author\/dmueller\/"}]}},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p7tdGk-1Pu","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":7079,"url":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2006\/11\/16\/north-the-makin\/","url_meta":{"origin":7036,"position":0},"title":"North, The Making of Knowledge in Composition","author":"Derek Mueller","date":"November 16, 2006","format":false,"excerpt":"North, Stephen M. The Making of Knowledge in Composition. Upper Montclair, N.J.: Boynton\/Cook, 1987. North's 1987 \"portrait\"--importantly the first theoretical monograph in the field--sets out with a few central questions: What counts as knowledge in Composition? How will lore and practitioner-knowledge be valued as the field pursues professionalization and methodological\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Writing Technologies&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Writing Technologies","link":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/category\/writing_technol\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":7006,"url":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2006\/07\/25\/foster-what-are\/","url_meta":{"origin":7036,"position":1},"title":"Foster, &#8220;What Are We Talking About&#8230;Composition&#8221;","author":"Derek Mueller","date":"July 25, 2006","format":false,"excerpt":"Foster, David. \"What Are We Talking About When We Talk About Composition?\" JAC 8 (1988): 30-40. Foster sets up a tension between scientistic and humanistic approaches to composition by giving a reading of three seminal texts: Beach and Bridwell's New Directions in Composition (1984), Hillocks's Research on Written Composition (1986),\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Writing Technologies&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Writing Technologies","link":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/category\/writing_technol\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6995,"url":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2006\/07\/07\/lauer-compositi\/","url_meta":{"origin":7036,"position":2},"title":"Lauer, &#8220;Composition Studies: Dappled Discpline&#8221;","author":"Derek Mueller","date":"July 7, 2006","format":false,"excerpt":"Lauer, Janice. \"Composition Studies: Dappled Discipline.\" Rhetoric Review 3.1 (1984): 20-28. Lauer deals with the disciplinary of composition studies in this piece. She is particularly concerned with qualities of the discipline that should inform the planning of graduate programs in composition studies. Briefly she acknowledges pioneers of the field who,\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Writing Technologies&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Writing Technologies","link":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/category\/writing_technol\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":7010,"url":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2006\/07\/27\/olson-the-death\/","url_meta":{"origin":7036,"position":3},"title":"Olson, &#8220;The Death of Composition as an Intellectual Discipline&#8221;","author":"Derek Mueller","date":"July 27, 2006","format":false,"excerpt":"Olson, Gary. \"The Death of Composition as an Intellectual Discipline.\" Olson 23-31. Olson begins with a glaring critique of the perceived split between high-theory elites who avoid \"the problems of the classroom\" and those who would see composition as centrally concerned with \"self-reflection about the teaching of writing or about\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Writing Technologies&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Writing Technologies","link":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/category\/writing_technol\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6482,"url":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2006\/01\/12\/jacing-around-w\/","url_meta":{"origin":7036,"position":4},"title":"Bibliometrics JACing","author":"Derek Mueller","date":"January 12, 2006","format":false,"excerpt":"I got caught up reading the Moretti Event over at The Valve, but I still have a minute to post a few notes about something I was thinking about earlier today.\u00a0 I read the introduction to David Smit's The End of Composition Studies yesterday; there, he has this to say\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Methods&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Methods","link":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/category\/method\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":7083,"url":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2006\/11\/22\/fulkerson-compo\/","url_meta":{"origin":7036,"position":5},"title":"Fulkerson, &#8220;Composition at the Turn of the Twenty-First Century&#8221;","author":"Derek Mueller","date":"November 22, 2006","format":false,"excerpt":"Fulkerson, Richard. \"Summary and Critique: Composition at the Turn of the Twenty-first Century.\" CCC 56.4 (2005): 654-687. Fulkerson's ten-year follow-up to earlier reports on the condition of composition studies concludes with premonitions about the field's disunity and the \"new theory wars\" (681). As a \"map [of] a large and complicated\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Writing Technologies&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Writing Technologies","link":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/category\/writing_technol\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Fulkerson Grid - Composition's Pedagogical Quandary","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/static.flickr.com\/111\/303929124_222ba3b5e7.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7036","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7036"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7036\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7036"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7036"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7036"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}