{"id":6122,"date":"2004-07-04T14:38:04","date_gmt":"2004-07-04T14:38:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2004\/07\/04\/witte-1984-topi\/"},"modified":"2004-07-04T14:38:04","modified_gmt":"2004-07-04T14:38:04","slug":"witte-1984-topi","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2004\/07\/04\/witte-1984-topi\/","title":{"rendered":"Witte, 1984, &#8220;Topical Structure and Revision&#8221;"},"content":{"rendered":"<span class=\"span-reading-time rt-reading-time\" style=\"display: block;\"><span class=\"rt-label rt-prefix\">\u23f3 Approximate reading time: <\/span> <span class=\"rt-time\"> 5<\/span> <span class=\"rt-label rt-postfix\">mins<\/span><\/span><p class=\"citation\">&nbsp;Witte,<br \/>\nStephen. &quot;Topical Structure and Revision: An Exploratory Study.&#8221; <i>On Writing Research: The Braddock Essays, 1975-1998<\/i>.<br \/>\nEd. Lisa Ede. New York: Bedford St. Martin&#8217;s, 1999. 132-155. <\/p>\n<p><b>Big Idea<br \/>\n<\/b>Stephen Witte&#8217;s 1983 article reports on the quantifiable patterns of topical<br \/>\nstructure in a sample of written revisions of a common text.&nbsp; Through<br \/>\ncomparative readings of revised texts and a common seminal text (from which the<br \/>\nrevisers set out), Witte&#8217;s study surmises that the reviser&#8217;s treatment of<br \/>\nsentence topics correlates to the writer\/reviser&#8217;s understanding of the text&#8217;s<br \/>\ndiscourse topic.&nbsp; The relationship between a discourse topic and sentence<br \/>\ntopic figures significantly into Witte&#8217;s work; he adopts a vocabulary of<br \/>\nspecialized terms such as &quot;topicalization,&quot; &quot;theme\/rheme,&quot;<br \/>\n&quot;macroproposition,&quot; and &quot;hypertheme&quot; in his elaboration of<br \/>\nmethods.&nbsp; According to Witte, sentence topics may or may not house<br \/>\ndiscourse topics, but the writer\/reviser&#8217;s prior knowledge and readerly <i>understanding<\/i><br \/>\nof the seminal text&#8217;s discourse topic guides the <i>choices<\/i> applied<br \/>\nthroughout revision.&nbsp; Witte acknowledges his methods are suited to<br \/>\ninformational texts, collaboratively revised. Notably, he delivers some<br \/>\neighteen-plus name references in the first three or four pages of the article (a<br \/>\ncluster of comp\/rhet folks as well as several {unfamiliar-to-me} structural<br \/>\nlinguists from the <a href=\"www.press.jhu.edu\/books\/hopkins_guide_to_literary_theory\/prague_school_structuralism.html\" >Prague<br \/>\nSchool<\/a>).<\/p>\n<p><b>Wondering About<br \/>\n<\/b>With all due respect, big chunks of this essay were a muddle; lesser chunks<br \/>\nwere interesting in a structuralism-amuck, 1983-snapshot kind of way.&nbsp;<br \/>\nWitte&#8217;s theoretical lead-in to the more empirical study sparked a few<br \/>\ninteresting issues.&nbsp; Without explicitly discussing sentence topics in terms<br \/>\nof <i>links<\/i> and <i>relationships<\/i>, Witte is centrally concerned with<br \/>\nsyntactic cues, their systematic connections, and the role of the writer\/reviser<br \/>\nin reshaping those cues toward a more coherent, unified discourse topic. We<br \/>\ncould bend this analysis to <i>rhythm<\/i> or <i>pulse<\/i>&#8211;the discourse topic&#8217;s<br \/>\ndependence on the coordination of smaller units.&nbsp;&nbsp; As provocative as<br \/>\nthis is, the structuralist drawback impends: the study builds from a kind of<br \/>\nde-natured, de-cultured &quot;writer&#8217;s hand(s)&quot; (not unlike de Saussure&#8217;s<br \/>\nfeatureless talking heads).&nbsp; The situation is absent: <i>topoi<\/i> sans <i>kairos<\/i>.&nbsp;&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>The portions of the essay that scale the revisions from high-score to<br \/>\nlow-score based on the sentence topic patterns (matches, deviations, etc.) were<br \/>\nhard to read.&nbsp; It&#8217;s filled with statistical references, and it&#8217;s never easy<br \/>\nto connect the high\/low assessments to specific texts (only a few of which are<br \/>\nsampled).&nbsp; Witte notes that one of the setbacks in his study is the problem<br \/>\nof &quot;no average text.&quot;&nbsp; In fact, the whole piece is responsibly<br \/>\nself-conscious; he incorporates lots of reminders that this is &quot;an<br \/>\nexploratory study,&quot; and it&#8217;s simply a frame for writing researchers to<br \/>\nconsider.&nbsp; But how should we use this? What other applications might<br \/>\nWitte&#8217;s work hold?&nbsp; I don&#8217;t have a lot of ideas about this, but as I read,<br \/>\nI started to think that much of this analysis could be applied electronically<br \/>\n(especially the clause-length stuff).&nbsp; In other words, when I want to <i>see<\/i><br \/>\nrevision (separated from the document), I simply use Word to compare<br \/>\ntexts.&nbsp; The changes are highlighted, easy to view.&nbsp; I&#8217;ve never<br \/>\nconsidered the quality of a revision in terms of altered topic patterns;<br \/>\ninstead, I simply have a glance at the depth of revision, the way the writer<br \/>\nresponded to specific in-text suggestions or questions, and any oversights,<br \/>\nomissions, or clear decisions <i>not<\/i> to make changes.&nbsp; And while I&#8217;m<br \/>\nnot in favor of computers as stand-alone readers, I continue to wonder how<br \/>\ntechnologies can assist our reading by helping us see patterns in texts (not to<br \/>\nkick out sloppily composed standardized exams).&nbsp; Witte&#8217;s approach, I think,<br \/>\ncould be rendered into a software application&#8211;an application that might be<br \/>\nuseful if we use it to see texts differently rather than measuring those texts<br \/>\nas successes or failures.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>Witte&#8217;s approach to measuring sophistication of revisions based on topic<br \/>\npatterns doesn&#8217;t acknowledge rhetorical strategies, deliberate re-arrangement,<br \/>\ntopical abstraction or exemplification.&nbsp; All of these forces ought to<br \/>\nfigure into revision&#8211;even in classifiably informative texts, and studies of<br \/>\ntopic structure alone might not reveal such developments.&nbsp; It also sets up<br \/>\nknowledge of audience and revision in fairly narrow terms.&nbsp; Revision isn&#8217;t<br \/>\nalways (ever!) a sealed-off, exclusive, after-writing stage; knowledge of<br \/>\naudience, however carefully ascertained, is imperfect, incomplete.&nbsp;<br \/>\nSimilarly, while the sentence topics can be identified and tagged, discourse<br \/>\ntopics spill, morph, shift&#8211;endlessly.&nbsp; By this, I mean the sentence enjoys<br \/>\npunctuated boundaries; a discourse topic flows and is not frozen in time.&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p><b>Passages<br \/>\n<\/b>&quot;Although making inferences about composing processes from written<br \/>\nproducts is somewhat risky, the method I have outlined and applied to controlled<br \/>\nrevisions of college writers appears to be a promising one for studying the<br \/>\ntextual causes and effects of revision.&nbsp; It is a method which may allow<br \/>\nresearchers and teachers alike to study the decision-making processes writers<br \/>\nuse during revision&quot; (153). <\/p>\n<p>&quot;Whether the findings hold for other kinds of texts collected under<br \/>\ndifferent circumstances and evaluated by different kinds of raters remains an<br \/>\nopen question&quot; (153).&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>&quot;In this regard, topical structure analysis&#8211;unlike the analytic methods<br \/>\ndesigned to examine the effects of the revision&#8211;enables the researcher to<br \/>\nexplore the relationship between the textual causes of revision, the text<br \/>\nfeatures to which the writer as reader responds, and the effects those changes<br \/>\nhave on the revised text&quot; (153). <\/p>\n<p>&quot;Thus in revising the original text, the high-score writers chose to<br \/>\nreduce the number of sentence topics and to develop more fully those retained,<br \/>\nwhereas the writers of the low-score texts chose to increase the number of<br \/>\nsentence topics and to develop each of them less fully&quot; (153).&nbsp; <\/p>\n<p>~muddle~ &quot;Differences between the two sets of revisions can also be<br \/>\nattributed to differences in the mean number of t-units per sentence<br \/>\ntopic.&nbsp; The low-score revisions averaged 1.89 t-units per sentence topic, while<br \/>\nthe high-score revisions averaged 2.59, about 27% more than the low-score<br \/>\nones&quot; (150). ~muddle~ <\/p>\n<p>&quot;The two groups&#8217; differing constructions of the <i>gist<\/i> of the<br \/>\noriginal governed their choices of sentence topics.&nbsp; These different<br \/>\nsentence topics, in turn, led to different decisions about content which could<br \/>\nbe deleted from the original&quot; (149). <\/p>\n<p>&quot;But on what basis did the two groups decide which elements of the<br \/>\noriginal text to delete? I suspect that they based such decisions on their<br \/>\nconstructions of a <i>discourse topic<\/i> or a <i>gist<\/i> for the original<br \/>\ntext, because those constructions seem to differ in important ways&quot; (147). <\/p>\n<p>&quot;When what is said (by the principal verbs in the text) about the<br \/>\ndiscourse topic is combined with the discourse topic, the product is the &#8216;macroproposition,&#8217;<br \/>\n&#8216;gist,&#8217; or &#8216;point&#8217; of the text&quot; (140). <\/p>\n<p>&quot;As I have explained it, topical structure analysis would seem to be a<br \/>\nuseful tool for studying the textual cues which may prompt revision and for<br \/>\nstudying the effects of revision on text structure, primarily because it<br \/>\naccounts for and illuminates the interaction of reading and writing during the<br \/>\nrevision process. Topical structure analysis should enable researchers to chart<br \/>\nmore efficiently the actual decisions writers make as they revise texts&quot;<br \/>\n(140). <\/p>\n<p>&quot;Such a view of the relationship of <i>subtopics<\/i> (i.e., sentence<br \/>\ntopics) to the <i>discourse topic<\/i> surmounts the problem of using the<br \/>\northographic boundaries of sentences and paragraphs as the principal semantic or<br \/>\nmeaning markers in extended discourse. (Sentence boundaries can vary<br \/>\nindependently of meaning when writers choose to produce compound or<br \/>\ncompound-complex sentences, and I can find no evidence that writers segment<br \/>\ntexts into paragraphs in consistent ways.)&quot; (137). <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p><span class=\"span-reading-time rt-reading-time\" style=\"display: block;\"><span class=\"rt-label rt-prefix\">\u23f3 Approximate reading time: <\/span> <span class=\"rt-time\"> 5<\/span> <span class=\"rt-label rt-postfix\">mins<\/span><\/span>&nbsp;Witte, Stephen. &quot;Topical Structure and Revision: An Exploratory Study.&#8221; On Writing Research: The Braddock Essays, 1975-1998. Ed. Lisa Ede. New York: Bedford St. Martin&#8217;s, 1999. 132-155. Big Idea Stephen Witte&#8217;s 1983 article reports on the quantifiable patterns of topical structure in a sample of written revisions of a common text.&nbsp; Through comparative readings of revised&#8230;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"ngg_post_thumbnail":0,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_publicize_message":"","jetpack_publicize_feature_enabled":true,"jetpack_social_post_already_shared":false,"jetpack_social_options":{"image_generator_settings":{"template":"highway","default_image_id":0,"font":"","enabled":false},"version":2},"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[167],"tags":[203,252,150,253,251,250],"class_list":["post-6122","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-reading_notes","tag-revision","tag-semantic","tag-structure","tag-syntactic","tag-topical","tag-witte"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.0 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Witte, 1984, &quot;Topical Structure and Revision&quot; - Earth Wide Moth<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2004\/07\/04\/witte-1984-topi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Witte, 1984, &quot;Topical Structure and Revision&quot; - Earth Wide Moth\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"\u23f3 Approximate reading time:  5 mins&nbsp;Witte, Stephen. &quot;Topical Structure and Revision: An Exploratory Study.&#8221; On Writing Research: The Braddock Essays, 1975-1998. Ed. Lisa Ede. New York: Bedford St. Martin&#8217;s, 1999. 132-155. Big Idea Stephen Witte&#8217;s 1983 article reports on the quantifiable patterns of topical structure in a sample of written revisions of a common text.&nbsp; Through comparative readings of revised...\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2004\/07\/04\/witte-1984-topi\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Earth Wide Moth\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:publisher\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/derek.mueller\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:author\" content=\"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/derek.mueller\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2004-07-04T14:38:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Derek Mueller\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Derek Mueller\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"6 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/2004\\\/07\\\/04\\\/witte-1984-topi\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/2004\\\/07\\\/04\\\/witte-1984-topi\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Derek Mueller\",\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/66fc5e80a62f53057760790b1cfeb24b\"},\"headline\":\"Witte, 1984, &#8220;Topical Structure and Revision&#8221;\",\"datePublished\":\"2004-07-04T14:38:04+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/2004\\\/07\\\/04\\\/witte-1984-topi\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1297,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/66fc5e80a62f53057760790b1cfeb24b\"},\"keywords\":[\"revision\",\"semantic\",\"structure\",\"syntactic\",\"topical\",\"Witte\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Reading Notes\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/2004\\\/07\\\/04\\\/witte-1984-topi\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/2004\\\/07\\\/04\\\/witte-1984-topi\\\/\",\"name\":\"Witte, 1984, \\\"Topical Structure and Revision\\\" - Earth Wide Moth\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\"},\"datePublished\":\"2004-07-04T14:38:04+00:00\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/2004\\\/07\\\/04\\\/witte-1984-topi\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/2004\\\/07\\\/04\\\/witte-1984-topi\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/2004\\\/07\\\/04\\\/witte-1984-topi\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Home\",\"item\":\"http:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Witte, 1984, &#8220;Topical Structure and Revision&#8221;\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"http:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/\",\"name\":\"Earth Wide Moth\",\"description\":\"\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/66fc5e80a62f53057760790b1cfeb24b\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"http:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":[\"Person\",\"Organization\"],\"@id\":\"http:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/66fc5e80a62f53057760790b1cfeb24b\",\"name\":\"Derek Mueller\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/04\\\/cropped-bmartwork.png?fit=1220%2C480\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/04\\\/cropped-bmartwork.png?fit=1220%2C480\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/04\\\/cropped-bmartwork.png?fit=1220%2C480\",\"width\":1220,\"height\":480,\"caption\":\"Derek Mueller\"},\"logo\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/i0.wp.com\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2023\\\/04\\\/cropped-bmartwork.png?fit=1220%2C480\"},\"sameAs\":[\"http:\\\/\\\/www.derekmueller.net\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/derek.mueller\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.instagram.com\\\/dereknmueller\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/www.youtube.com\\\/user\\\/dnmueller\"],\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.earthwidemoth.com\\\/blog\\\/author\\\/dmueller\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Witte, 1984, \"Topical Structure and Revision\" - Earth Wide Moth","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2004\/07\/04\/witte-1984-topi\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Witte, 1984, \"Topical Structure and Revision\" - Earth Wide Moth","og_description":"\u23f3 Approximate reading time:  5 mins&nbsp;Witte, Stephen. &quot;Topical Structure and Revision: An Exploratory Study.&#8221; On Writing Research: The Braddock Essays, 1975-1998. Ed. Lisa Ede. New York: Bedford St. Martin&#8217;s, 1999. 132-155. Big Idea Stephen Witte&#8217;s 1983 article reports on the quantifiable patterns of topical structure in a sample of written revisions of a common text.&nbsp; Through comparative readings of revised...","og_url":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2004\/07\/04\/witte-1984-topi\/","og_site_name":"Earth Wide Moth","article_publisher":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/derek.mueller","article_author":"https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/derek.mueller","article_published_time":"2004-07-04T14:38:04+00:00","author":"Derek Mueller","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Derek Mueller","Est. reading time":"6 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2004\/07\/04\/witte-1984-topi\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2004\/07\/04\/witte-1984-topi\/"},"author":{"name":"Derek Mueller","@id":"http:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/66fc5e80a62f53057760790b1cfeb24b"},"headline":"Witte, 1984, &#8220;Topical Structure and Revision&#8221;","datePublished":"2004-07-04T14:38:04+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2004\/07\/04\/witte-1984-topi\/"},"wordCount":1297,"publisher":{"@id":"http:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/66fc5e80a62f53057760790b1cfeb24b"},"keywords":["revision","semantic","structure","syntactic","topical","Witte"],"articleSection":["Reading Notes"],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2004\/07\/04\/witte-1984-topi\/","url":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2004\/07\/04\/witte-1984-topi\/","name":"Witte, 1984, \"Topical Structure and Revision\" - Earth Wide Moth","isPartOf":{"@id":"http:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/#website"},"datePublished":"2004-07-04T14:38:04+00:00","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2004\/07\/04\/witte-1984-topi\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2004\/07\/04\/witte-1984-topi\/"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2004\/07\/04\/witte-1984-topi\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"http:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Witte, 1984, &#8220;Topical Structure and Revision&#8221;"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"http:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/#website","url":"http:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/","name":"Earth Wide Moth","description":"","publisher":{"@id":"http:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/66fc5e80a62f53057760790b1cfeb24b"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"http:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":["Person","Organization"],"@id":"http:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/#\/schema\/person\/66fc5e80a62f53057760790b1cfeb24b","name":"Derek Mueller","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/cropped-bmartwork.png?fit=1220%2C480","url":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/cropped-bmartwork.png?fit=1220%2C480","contentUrl":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/cropped-bmartwork.png?fit=1220%2C480","width":1220,"height":480,"caption":"Derek Mueller"},"logo":{"@id":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/cropped-bmartwork.png?fit=1220%2C480"},"sameAs":["http:\/\/www.derekmueller.net\/","https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/derek.mueller","https:\/\/www.instagram.com\/dereknmueller\/","https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/user\/dnmueller"],"url":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/author\/dmueller\/"}]}},"jetpack_publicize_connections":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p7tdGk-1AK","jetpack-related-posts":[{"id":6065,"url":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2004\/04\/15\/braddock-1975-f\/","url_meta":{"origin":6122,"position":0},"title":"Braddock, 1975, &#8220;Frequency and Placement&#8221;","author":"Derek Mueller","date":"April 15, 2004","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0Braddock, Richard. \"The Frequency and Placement of Topic Sentences.\" On Writing Research: The Braddock Essays, 1975-1998. Ed. Lisa Ede. New York: Bedford St. Martin's, 1999. 29-42. Big Idea Braddock's essay on the placement and patterns of topic sentences exposes a problem of referring students to mythic truths--affirmed in popular textbooks\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Reading Notes&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Reading Notes","link":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/category\/reading_notes\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6068,"url":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2004\/04\/18\/flower-et-al-19\/","url_meta":{"origin":6122,"position":1},"title":"Flower, et al., 1987, &#8220;Strategies of Revision&#8221;","author":"Derek Mueller","date":"April 18, 2004","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0Flower, Linda, et al. \"Detection, Diagnosis, and the Strategies of Revision.\" On Writing Research: The Braddock Essays, 1975-1998. Ed. Lisa Ede. New York: Bedford St. Martin's, 1999. 191-228. Big Idea Over two years, five contributing researchers sought to refine the key intellectual actions in revision. The study dealt with both\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Reading Notes&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Reading Notes","link":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/category\/reading_notes\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":7109,"url":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2007\/08\/21\/flower-scriver\/","url_meta":{"origin":6122,"position":2},"title":"Flower, Scriver, Stratman, Carey, and Hayes, &quot;Cognitive Process in Revision&quot;","author":"Derek Mueller","date":"August 21, 2007","format":false,"excerpt":"Flower, Linda S., Karen A. Scriver, James F. Stratman, Linda Carey, and John R. Hayes. \"Cognitive Processes in Revision.\" Advances in Applied Psycholinguistics. Sheldon Rosenberg ed. New York: Cambridge, 1987. 176-240. This team-authored article advances the cognitive process work done by Flower and Hayes in the early 1980's by modeling\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Models&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Models","link":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/category\/models\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"Revision Model, p 185","src":"https:\/\/i0.wp.com\/farm2.static.flickr.com\/1252\/1196475574_b9a5eada12.jpg?resize=350%2C200","width":350,"height":200},"classes":[]},{"id":7047,"url":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2006\/10\/04\/post-1-2\/","url_meta":{"origin":6122,"position":3},"title":"Bazerman, &#8220;Discursively Structured Activities&#8221;","author":"Derek Mueller","date":"October 4, 2006","format":false,"excerpt":"Bazerman, Charles. \"Discursively Structured Activities.\" Mind, Culture, and Activity 4.4 (1997): 296-308. Bazerman is concerned with accounting descriptively for the roles of discourse in structuring systemic activity. He notes that discourse is a fundament to social structure; it provides a \"regularizing force.\" As such, Bazerman folds together Vygotskyan principles of\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Tools-in-use&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Tools-in-use","link":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/category\/toolsinuse\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6090,"url":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2004\/05\/16\/dangelo-1977-in\/","url_meta":{"origin":6122,"position":4},"title":"D&#8217;Angelo, 1977, &#8220;Intelligible Structure&#8221;","author":"Derek Mueller","date":"May 16, 2004","format":false,"excerpt":"\u00a0D'Angelo, Frank. \"The Search for Intelligible Structure in the Teaching of Composition.\" On Writing Research: The Braddock Essays, 1975-1998. Ed. Lisa Ede. New York: Bedford St. Martin's, 1999. 51-59. Big Idea Look!\u00a0 We, compositionists, are disciplinarily vital. We have an epicenter, proven radials, recognizable and defensible structures holding our work\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Reading Notes&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Reading Notes","link":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/category\/reading_notes\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]},{"id":6902,"url":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/2008\/02\/19\/second-subseque\/","url_meta":{"origin":6122,"position":5},"title":"Second, Subsequent Streams","author":"Derek Mueller","date":"February 19, 2008","format":false,"excerpt":"Revisions have been challenging. Having resolved myself to more drafting before squaring with revisions, the commented drafts of my dissertation's introduction and first two chapters tend to taunt me. I haven't figured out how to fit it in, how to make room for it given the other regular paces. I'd\u2026","rel":"","context":"In &quot;Rhythms&quot;","block_context":{"text":"Rhythms","link":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/category\/rhythms\/"},"img":{"alt_text":"","src":"","width":0,"height":0},"classes":[]}],"jetpack_likes_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6122","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6122"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6122\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6122"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6122"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.earthwidemoth.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6122"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}