Compact

Dashing off to class in a few minutes; feel like I’d have more time to compose myself at oneword [via Dr. B’s Blog].  Still working on the Point/PowerPoint sequence, so maybe I should prefer this format:

  • Sorry I missed Chuck’s NCAA Championship game blog last night (which I can’t link to right now because something is clunking up the connection).  Dr. Fabulous won the men’s tournament pool with 126 points.  I lumped a whole 62 points.  Last place.  It was fun?  Chuck has me beat by 300 points in the women’s tournament pool; at least I’m assured second place.
  • Following Mike’s posts on composition’s economies and informational commodity.  Meaning to get over there to mention that it makes me think about Marx’s “reproduction of labor power.”
  • Meeting with an appraiser later this a.m. (immediately after class!) to clear up her formulaic  valuation of this lean-to we call home.  Count the ceiling fans, figure the square footage, peep at the neighborhood, see whether there are any piles of garbage in the yard, interrogate the ages of
    everything from the asphalt shingles overhead to the rickety steps at the back (which’ll never pass inspection, I’m worried). Need to dump this joint by the end of June so we can load up for our move to New York. I wonder if anyone’s ever sold a home by advertising it on their blog.

None of these are suited to PowerPoint; the words are hopelessly effluent in the blogspace.  Now to drum up some fresh roasted.

Neil Diamond Double-Step March

Last week, Tuesday, we were invited to Friday’s annual Founder’s Day gala
event for the U. Common at many higher ed. institutions, I guess, Founder’s Day is a ceremonial gesture at legacy, self-definition of the institution and, of course, fundraising. We accepted two seats; would be sitting among friends at a table sponsored by an admirable company who didn’t have many people wanting to go.  So we lined Ph. up with a sitter (er, attendant, now that he’s a teen), and went on our well-dressed way.  

The theme for the night was globalism. Small, blue sponge balls lined with latitude and longitude, but without continental shapes were propped in the centerpieces, for example.  They started the program with forty
international students–most of whom I know by name–marching into the banquet
room with the flags of the 98 countries represented by students who attend the
institution.  Two at a time.  The flags didn’t match with the
students’ home-countries of record, since there were 40 students and 98
flags.  They came, two by two, a row of symbolic internationalism
choreographed to Neil Diamond’s "America."

Continue reading →

Piping Up, Down Again

I don’t know if it’s narrowly analogous to my experience developing and teaching online courses since the fall of ’01, but the technophilic pied piper of computer-mediated distance ed–who
fluted for distance initiatives through glowing positivisms–in the late 90’s, has yielded to
a symphony of vastly more critical, responsible pedagogies, mindful of the barbs
described in Hara
and Kling’s article
.  Computer-mediated distance ed programs have grown
up in the five years since the article was published; they’ve been (and continue
to be) shaped by theoretical currents in technology and media, by laborious,
ongoing revisions guided by new experiences and best practices.  They
continue to take seriously the frustrations expressed by students–frustrations
about tech speed, about confusing explanations of assignments, about feedback
time and engagement.  And attrition rates continue to be a question–or,
perhaps, only part of a broader question about what’s bound up in the pursuit of
excellence, the sort of excellence that lives on tireless exertion, dialectic
reflection and conversation on ways to make the programs better.  A recent
faculty survey where I teach asked instructors, "why do students withdraw
from your online courses?"  My responses were speculative; the knowledgeable
answers are harder to produce than a summary of the rants and rumblings of
students who endured the term of study then posted wry comments on the
instructor evaluation form.  So many of our distance learning students are
full-time military who work and travel, who have families and heaps of other commitments;
they tend to be realistic about their workloads and planned TDY excursions, and,
when confronted with an unusually rigorous stint in composition or the
introductory humanities survey, I think many students opt out because the
promises made in the syllabus are clear–perhaps daunting.  By what other
terms can eight-week online course work?

I brought this back to my blog rather than commenting over at Palimpsest and

Dennis Jerz’s Literacy Weblog
because I often get the feeling that I have my head in the
sand about ways that computer-mediated distance education is done at other
institutions.  I honestly don’t know much about how it works
elsewhere.  When the subject of computer-mediated distance learning comes
up, I falter, succumb to my doubts about all that I don’t know about how it’s
handled anywhere else. (are you on Blackboad? WebCT? VCampus? hybrid or mixed-mode?
meeting in person occasionally or always via computer? supplemented by video or
live chat? are your face-to-face curricula migrated for online delivery for
outcomes comparisons? vice versa?  are faculty who teach online also
required to teach on in bricks-n-mortar spaces? must instructors encode (HTML
the content) their own courses? are the courses peer reviewed? how is faculty
training and mentoring handled?). 

I’ve given half a thought to starting a blog for distance ed instructors in
comp/rhet, including the 15 or so instructors who teach the classes I’m familiar
with.  And perhaps it would work better if it was wide open to instructors
from various institutions, except that cross-talk can be tougher to negotiate
when we set out from considerably inconstant curricular and ideological frames.  But to the extent
instructors are geographically spread out; I wonder how widely they are
pedagogically spread out, too–to what degree my sense of best practices jibes
with my peers’ understandings of best practices in computer-mediated distance
ed (esp. as it ties to essayism, close reading, discourse analysis).  What better way to reconcile it than by a blog–a blog for overlaps in computer mediated distance ed and on-site ed folded together under tech/comp/rhet. Anyone know of a listserv or other forum where this is already going on?

About-face in behemoth retail

A link to this article called "Bye
Bye Big Box
" showed up in my mail today.  It was routed through the Public.Spaces  listserv, available with other a few other
space-concerned lists at the Project for Public Spaces web site. I haven’t been a subscriber for long, but I was interested to see what shiny bits might churn through their channels.  And then came the article today on Wal-Mart’s commitment to the revitalization of community spaces–a clear, surprising reversal against their record for building indoor, suburban sprawl-marts filled wall to wall with discount goods.  The article makes its name in the April newsletter from PPS, and I find the issue’s theme, "faked spaces," to be intriguing.  It suggests–rightly, I think–the appearance of a drastic turn away from the tyranny of naked suburban commercialism: Wal-Mart’s legacy of profiteering. 
Here’s a short blurb from the article:

"[Wal-mart is] tired of being on the wrong side of the
community-building equation," he added, noting that he believes the
firm’s bottom line can take a back seat to broader community [regional] goals.
"We think we can take that to the shareholders and make a convincing case that a stronger local economy will be better for our stores in the long
run," Glass said. (first inset mine)

I’m curious about what this will look like.  I wonder how it figures
into Wal-Mart’s profit formula.  Will we see town squares made over with a
sweeping infestation of so many mini Wal-Marts?  Will we need shopping
carts to load up there and there and there and across the block, at the Wal-Mart
over there?  I sure don’t want to rain on this promise, yet; I look forward
to experiencing Wal-Mart’s reinvestment in vital community centers. But we can’t
blame anyone for being skeptical of this plan, this reversal of the retailer’s
legacy.  It’ll be undone when?  

It reminds me of an exchange I enjoyed last fall with a student who was
stationed at Mountain Home AFB in Mountain Home, Idaho.  He wrote–for
intro to humanities (the segment on industry, labor and consumerism)–about the
deep-felt resentment openly shared among many of the locals in Mountain Home
since the Wal-Mart installation embargoed the base from the once-lively city
square.  According to the student, Wal-Mart was the subject of
whole-community scorn, but the people took jobs there and shopped there because
the market became dependant on the superstore.  I look forward to the new
model.  Of course, as little as I know about commercial real estate, I wonder whether the vacant big boxes of America will be empty for long. Doubtful that they’ll be torn down, remade green. 

Oh, and one more thing. Guess I should re-think yesterday’s rant, since I just picked up on the role of
"slide shows" in the appeal:

Kent said he was surprised but pleased that his speech had created such an
immediate impact. "Frankly I expected a hostile reaction," he
admitted, "but the slide show depicting small, public markets
around the world seemed to win them over, especially the shots of couples
kissing over various varieties of fresh vegetables. Those images can sway even the most hardcore bottom-line oriented people." (emphasis mine)

Slide shows, kissing and vegetables? Just great. Civic progress via sexed up PowerPoint.

Update (4.2.04, 9:30 a.m.):  Potential for coll|u/i|sion between the Wal-mart
promise of fractal marketplaces and this plan for discreet
security
(call it what you will)?

Poised with Swiffer

Notice: this is a buttered toast entry whose rhetorical purpose is to
displace the hallucinations and ramblings slung up by dmueller
Good thing that’s not the name of this blog’s owner and chief operator. 
Who hacked my site and posted that picture of Bart Simpson?  I want
answers!

But I’d settle for comments.  See, crowds make me nervous, and, for some
reason or another, Earth Wide Moth is getting unprecedented traffic
lately. Smart mobs? There’s no evidence anyone’s reading here; but the visitors
are sliding through.  Browsers are picking it up, putting it to the screen.
So, I concocted a plan to insert this buttered toast entry–a defensive displacer entry
meant to float an unseemly entry lower on the page.  Maybe we should call
it a marshmallow entry or mallow entry for short.  I haven’t done my
homework on whether this kind of entry has been named before, and I don’t have
time to explore b/c I gotta bury yesterday’s entry right away. (You’re only as
bloggy as your last entry!)

Just a few more lines and this entry will have fully served its purpose by
filing yesterday’s entry into the obscure #2 slot.  That said, I am
pleading with you, do not scroll the bar and do not turn the page.  Do not
read any previous entries in this blog.  You’ve been warned!

Where’d you put my laser pointer, Bart?

 

Voice: "Will the revolution be blogged?"
All the people: "Hell yeah!" 

Got that out the way.  It’s been said a time or two–it won’t be
blogged, it will be blogged, it won’t be blogged–so many daisy petals, so few
revolutions.  I’m wanting to talk shop here, talk pedagogy tonight, but I’m
in the midst of a set of mini-essays from humanities on Geertz’ Balinese
cockfight and the notion of common ground.  Sore eyes.  A few loose
ends of prep for Thursday a.m.

About that: we’re using the EN106
blog
this week as a note-sharing space.  I’m using all of the links
from TWiaOW
for the Point/PowerPoint sequence and then some.  We’re basically
reading the issue of efficiency in poorly conceived slide shows–the rationing
of language brought on by bullet points with the ever-popular PP program. 
We’re also using the sequence as a way to talk about the articles and
information credibility, especially as it applies to blog entries.  Here
are the links from the PPT sequence, in case anyone is interested in how the
popular business software continues to get attention (and not because it’s in
the biggest letters, as BULLET POINT A):

PowerPoint
Makes You Dumb, New York Times

(free subscription)

PowerPoint ReMix,
Aaron Swartz: The Weblog
 
ET on Columbia
Evidence-Analysis of Key Slide
 
Turning
Heads With PowerPoint, Wired News

PowerPoint
Is Evil, Wired

Learning
to Love PowerPoint, Wired
 
The
Level of Discourse Continues to Slide, New York Times
(PDF)
Absolute
PowerPoint, New Yorker
Here are a few others I’ve added:

Bullet Points may be Dangerous, But Don’t Blame PowerPoint, Presentations.com


Don’t Blame the Tool – Reader Responses, Presentations.com


To Avoid the Perils of PowerPoint, take a kid’s-eye view, Presentations.com


PowerPoint has Always been the Point, Presentations.com

Can This Off-Site
Be Saved, Fast Company

Honestly, this list serves a second purpose.  I want to be able to
send it any time I receive a PowerPoint show that would work better as a
traditionally formatted page.  Since I started thinking about this
sequence, my inflow of PowerPoint shows at work is at an all time high. 
Maybe PowerPoint is soo powerful that the mounting of critiques creates some
kind of karmic vacuum–PowerPoint skepticism met cosmically by a surge
of colorfully-themed shows rushed to the doubter’s inbox.  Two shows were
sent my way in the past week.  One was a self-evaluation for whether or not you
(dear reader) would be a fit candidate for teaching courses online. (Slide One:
Are you technically proficient with checking email?)  The other involves
staff encounters with media–how to talk to reporters. (Slide Fourteen: 1. Speak
in short, concise sentences.  There is no such thing as "off the
record.") Time for an analysis likening PowerPoint to The Blob
Seriously.  

I’ve got to get back to finishing touches on my night’s work (which, sorry to
say, blog, ain’t this).  But I wanted to plant another seed about divergent
uses for blogs in teaching composition.  I’ve been following the
discussions about the ways blogs hinge on concomitant reading and writing (via here
and here)
and also about the way blogs might be put to fairly limited uses by some
composition teachers (here). 
I can’t say that I’m addressing all or any of those important concerns in this
entry, but I am happy to chronicle my own discovery and rediscovering this
semester of the social dimension of blogs.  Blogs turn narrow conceptions of reading and writing
as private, independent, and isolationist upside down in favor of an extracurricular
literacy network–a connected arena of extraspatial (beyond the walls we meet
between) contact and community.  And, of course, there’s more to it than I
can plow through just now in the interest of convening tomorrow as a potentially
jubilant day.  But I want to note the latest activity I’m toying with–a
kind of bum-rush annotated bibliography via course blog–and say that I’m not
sure how I would have done it better before blogs converged with my
teaching.  In short, students in teams (two to an article) are writing
summative paragraphs for the first six articles from the set listed above. 
We’ll review the notes as a group next Tuesday, talk about ways the sources
might contribute to their upcoming essay projects and so on.  Setting a
category and enabling a simple search makes it possible for students to access
and share work they’ve done outside of class time.  Admittedly, this is my
first semester teaching with a weblog, so I can’t be sure what will happen.  I suppose that’s what
we could use–a record of best practices, if
only anecdotal evidence, of the many ways weblogs are growing the
possibilities for invigorating pedagogy.

Please Let It Be the Placebo

Well, now, don’t you look like a biomedical opportunist? Dragging
through the Academic Underground today, I was solicited to be a part of a
research study. 

Between the ages of 18-35?  Not much rounder than the average bear? 
Swimming against the current of inevitable financial distress?  Earn $550
for five one-hour visits over a one month period!

No.  I’m not interested.  Biomed research at its body-preying
finest.  I know they’ve resources aplenty, and experimental medical
research demands observable subjects.  So why am I disturbed?  1. 
The recruiters lead with money.  Recruiter: Couldn’t you think of anything
to spend $550 on?  Me: Sure.  CCCC.  But that was last week, and
all the fine comp bloggers have dispersed the conference far and wide, floating
notes and observations like so many generous leaflets into the blog-blowing
wind.  2.  The presence of the recruiters is University sanctioned. 
My read: the corporatization of the University given to physical intrusion. I
don’t know what is exchanged, what the University gets, that is, for allowing
the recruiters on campus.  Must be something.  Or is it seen as a
fair, prudent trade: $550 for experimental license.  The proposal situates
students (and, heck, anyone who strolls past the table) as a bodily subject, an
organism, rather than an intellectual subject.  Maybe that’s my personal
aversion, the chafe I’m feeling: the absence of a pedagogical ethic centered on
the student. 

I know this is a jaded entry; medical progress hinges on experimentation.
We’ve many fine enhancements in this life due to medical progress. But the
experimental arrangement isn’t as explicit as the financial reward for
consenting.  The experiment is shrouded in a puff of fiduciary glitter. 
So maybe that’s all there is to it.  I want it to be done differently. 
If you must exploit the hallway traffic of financially strapped students, pitch
the research on the merits of the project, introduce it as experimental
research, rather than teasing, "Hey, you want to make 550 clams?". 
But that’d be bad for recruiting, which means that it won’t happen this week or
next, and so I’ll quiet for now.

Reason #153: Blogging is Safer than Grill Repair

First signs of spring include firing up the grill and contemplating an oil
change and point by point inspection of the lawn mower.  I did both today,
firing and contemplating.  The firing was inspired when D. returned from
the market with bratwurst; the contemplating was brought on by the incredibly
rapid growth of purple-flowered weed sprigs overtaking the lawn.  Creeping
bellflowers?  Hell, I don’t know what.  But they’re tall and pleading
to be cut soon.  

The Thermos Millennium gas grill is approaching its fifth birthday.  I
spend the better part of Easter Sunday, 1999, with my brother-in-law (well, he
wasn’t my bro-in-law then, but he is now) matching up sprockets, force-fitting
parts and having an altogether bad time of piecing it together.  It’s named
Millennium, but I don’t think it will last more than another year or two, and
certainly no more than three.  Just last week I replaced a couple of bolts
holding one of the gas-regulator dials on; today, it was the igniter dangling by
a wire beneath the grease-caked underbelly.  Tough to get at.  Tough
to fix.  The igniter end is basically a spark plug–a ceramic separator
creates a space for the friction-generated voltage to arc.  The arc lights
the propane.  Burnt meat.  With the igniter end dangling beneath the
grill, I wasn’t sure what to do.  So I found a spot that looked like it
might serve as a shelf to introduce the spark to the gas and propped it
there.  But I had doubts that the igniter was working, so I popped the
ignite button and absorbed one shock.  15 volts?  20?  It was
working; we were well on our way to the first brats of 2004.  Well on our
way.

The shock absorption and my reporting of it to you via EWM warrants a bit of
explaining.  More than a few academic bloggers I read (more conveniently
with the assistance of Mozilla Firefox’s Aggreg8, which I’m learning to love)
have been questioning the vexed relationship between their weblogs and their
scholarship.  I consider myself to be more of an academic fringe-straddler,
one whose life is spread out in ways that conflate academic interests with a
less neatly intellectualized workaday life.  But I, too, wish for EWM to
serve more than a writing habit of convenience, to do more than chronicle day to
day ironies, the flush and flex of life.  I like the way the blog becomes a
storehouse for contingent issues and ideas; its utility is multifarious: writing
habit, public engagement, free-to-explore think space, platform, social forum,
experimental lab, diary-journal, unruly zone for discursive play.  All
of this will be worth returning to in the years ahead.  I’m sure of it.

You’re thinking it was more than 15 volts, eh?  Well, actually, the
shock is significant because I plied through 80 pages of Obedience to
Authority
today, and Stanley Milgram’s study was all about the willingness
of a subject to expose a learner to voltage-shocks,  escalating with each
incorrect answer and commanded by an authoritative experimenter. I don’t want to
leave behind the idea of agentic shift as a rhetorical event, especially as it
manifests through deference to technology in the guise of authority.  My
notes are still messy, and I’m just now chomping through the theoretically
tastiest one-third of Milgram’s book, but I am seeing connections, seeing needs
for differentiation and refinement in terms, seeing lots of ways agentic shift
can serve as a descriptive apparatus in composition and rhetoric. 
[situation is a locus of action, opposition to authority, agentic state, peer
rebellion, cybernetics, conscience and tensional system of the individual,
authority communicates itself, constancy of authority system, surveillance-panopticon
iterations *Bentham/Foucault*, Berlin’s noetic
field
]. I will flesh out those visions here, just as soon as I get my notes
in order.  That, too, is what the weblog does for me.  It’s
ever-present, bringing me to the edge of the reading chair, excited and
interested because my mind feels as if it is wrapped in one of those, "I’m
blogging this
" t-shirts.  The constancy of weblogging potential
while reading is invigorating.

This brings me to one other out there prospect for EWM.  In the
weeks ahead, I have slotted the return of Cross-Talk in Comp Theory and The
Braddock Essays
to my reading list (when does a list grow into something too
big to call a list?).  Brush-up reads to lubricate(!) the merge into a
doctoral program in the fall. So hold me to that; hold me to the promise of
bringing notes (even brief summative jottings) from those fine essays into this
space.  I know, lubricate sounds smartass, but it reminds me of my
big brother who is an adhesives chemist working and living in Detroit.  He
called today from his cell phone while driving to Toronto where he was heading
to troubleshoot something (likely) to do with robotic arms and glue
distribution.  J. and I have a terrific relationship; today he said he
called because he had spare weekend minutes.  And I want to come back to that, also–agency in the communicative act, deference to commodified time as it correlates to telephony and telegraphy.  But not now.  The Practice is on the tube.

Mechanical Memory

It’s been a lousy tech day, as tech days go.  Either that or I’ve been
face to face with the monitor for too long.  Started at the office
earlier–last indoor home event of the year.  Ph. went along because he
enjoys the games, whereas I’m obliged to be there–it’s work.  While the VB
match was playing out, I was, once again, in my boxy workspace, plunking
away.  I was trying to figure out how to customize the sanitize feature in
Movable Type.  Seemed easy enough.  I wanted to post a comment
yesterday with a couple of pictures, but when I went to post them, MT scrubbed
the img src tags out of the code.  Thus, no pictures.  

So I ransacked the support forum, searched and searched.  Came away with
some stuff about the .cfg file, how to pull it onto my hard drive as an ASCII
file where I could muss the code, FTP it back home again.  Presto! Didn’t
work.  No changes, even after rebuilding EWM, top to bottom.  I wasted
an hour trying to figure it out.  I even considered switching the
MTCommentbody and MTCommentpreview tags to version with sanitize exceptions, as
in mtcommentbody sanitize="approved tags here">.  In the end,
it was much easier.  There’s an override feature under one of the
configuration tabs.  Dumped in the tags I wanted to protect from the
sanitation crew; pics appeared perfectly.  

But the day wasn’t over.  Not even close.  As soon as I went to the
arena floor, both security officers pointed out to me that there was water
dripping on the hardwood.  Uh…where’s that coming from?  See, it’s a
dome, a rounded ceiling (which is also the wall).  At first–when the
building was puffed up four years ago–it was an inflated pocket, kind of like a
balloon, ultra thin.  The construction crews regulated the air pressure,
keeping it blown up while they worked inside, spraying the inner walls with a
fast-drying shot-crete, rather like gunnite.  Day by day they layered the
inside of the air-supported dome, layering a thick shell and fortifying a
magnificent dome.  I don’t know if the dome has a crack in it or if the
skylight is leaking.  I only know that it’s been raining a lot today, and
at work, there was water trickling on the inside.  Can’t fix what you can’t
find.  I was chomping a piece of Trident Original just for leaky-roof crises, but we couldn’t hone in on the origin.

Ph. and I left the gym and hustled to North Kansas City.  Petco or
Petsmart?  Some kind of pet shop.  He needed a new bag of Aspen
pellets for his Russian tortoise.  The tortoise was a Christmas
present.  We already have an aged dog, Max, so we wanted something for Ph.
that wouldn’t seem spry so as to upset Max’s senior years.  A Russian
tortoise is a perfect pet.  It (what, gender?) only needs water once a
month, it maws on lettuce or raisins or whatever, it doesn’t make any noise, and
it’s content in the yard, just walking *slowly* around. Max, who, as I said, exhibits signs of aging, doesn’t notice the tortoise; the tortoise doesn’t notice
him.  Flawless compatibility.

This evening, I was cutting and pasting html into the courseware interface
for into to humanities, reworking a few things, and touching up a prompt for one
of the weekly writing assignments.  One part of the course is a weekly
exploration–a 1-2 page mini-essay responding to issues in the reading or in the
course links.  Students have five chances to complete three during the
eight-week term. I feel compelled to switch up the exploration prompts from time
to time because, now that I’ve taught the course four or five terms, I get this
uncanny sense that I’m reading stuff I’ve read before.  I’m finding that
there’s really nothing to guard against a student in one term copying the full
texts of all course exchanges (threaded dialogue, other students’ assignments,
and so on), then passing it along to a student in a subsequent term.  This
can, of course, happen in face to face contexts, too. And it does.  But in
online courses, where all interchanges take shape in writing, the full platter
is captured.  It’s different every term, but there is no course
beyond the texts that are produced during it–all of which can be archived,
copied and shared. Good reasons for turning things over.    

My variation this afternoon and evening was to put together a prompt that
invited students to think about the points of contact between Simon Frith’s
essay "The Voice," which we come at through Ways of Reading, and Hit
Song Science
(via Collin
vs. Blog
).  I wrote a masterful prompt about HSS and listening habits,
about the measurable qualities of a song and what it means to quantify our
tastes.  And I usually don’t refer to anything I’ve done as masterful, but
at the moment Windows XP locked me (not responding) away from my work, it seemed
ever more brilliant and irreplaceable. No, of course you can’t tell I’m crying!
Inside, at least.  I worked for almost two hours on the whole lot (which
included some other general course updates).  Lost to a lockup.  You
know that sinking feeling?  I don’t lose stuff often, but I was doing some
screwy copy and past, then edit routine which left me, well, without the better
chunk of my work from the late afternoon.  I slunk back to it after a reset
and sweated out a much less impressive version of the prompt.  It’ll have
to do.